Who is in charge, the governor or Legislature?

Where is the balance of power in Utah’s government? Public opinion is divided — but we have thoughts on who is right

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

Political events of the last several months have emphasized the different approaches to public policy taken by Gov. Spencer Cox and most GOP lawmakers, even though they affiliate with the same political party. We explore how this impacts public perception about who holds the most clout in state government.

A recent Deseret News/Hinckley Institute of Politics poll revealed 33% of Utahns believe legislative leaders have the most influence in the state, and 32% believe the governor does. Is this perception by citizens a reality?

Pignanelli: “The same rule that teaches the propriety of a partition between the various branches of power, teaches us this partition ought to be so contrived as to render the one independent of the other.” — Alexander Hamilton

During my service in the Legislature, I witnessed the shift of a gubernatorial centric of power in state government towards a legislative axis. A classic example is that for a century, the Legislature utilized the governor’s budget for deliberations. Then they initiated the tradition of constructing their own budgetary document with occasional reference to the chief executive. This included increased scrutiny and accountability of appointed officials. For over two decades this metamorphosis continued. Many political observers believe these developments are unnatural and not beneficial.

I disagree.

Granted, my legislative background and lobbyist experience does not breed objectivity. But the facts demonstrate that many of the recognitions and awards Utah receives for quality management, technological advancement and transparency are substantially due to legislative initiatives.

Furthermore, Utahns noticed the legislature was the driving force for very high-profile measures including tax reform, modifying citizens initiatives, major capital improvements, responses to pandemic, readjustments to local control, etc. These actions were controversial, and sometimes fostered strong organic opposition. Yet, they planted a deep impression that part-time lawmakers were the energy behind many state policies. (This explains the passage of the recent constitutional amendment allowing the legislature to call itself into special session.)

A quarter century of transformation is evidence that citizens’ perception of a strong influence of Legislature is warranted. Thankfully, I paid attention when it began.

Webb: I believe Utah enjoys a very healthy balance of power in state government. There will always be ebbs and flows, pushing and pulling and natural tension, but I think the balance in clout, approval ratings and popularity is about where it should be.

It’s important to remember that on 90% or more of the issues, Cox and the Republican Legislature are in agreement. Cox is a little more moderate on social issues than a majority of Republican legislators, but the gap is not enormous. 

Both executive and legislative branches are led by mainstream, pragmatic politicians representative of most Utahns. If the Legislature was led and dominated by far-right extremists, we’d see many more battles.

It’s also worth noting that among Republicans, the governor is viewed as wielding more influence than lawmakers. Democrats say legislative leaders have more influence, but in their eyes that’s a negative thing because they often disagree with legislative decisions.   

The Legislature has strong leadership, and they’re not going to simply follow the governor’s lead. That’s a good thing. But the governor is highly visible and popular, and he has the entire executive branch of state government to do his bidding.

This balance is healthy for society and pays off in good governance and a robust economy. It’s what the founders intended in creating three separate branches of government that would check each other and prevent any individual or branch of government from becoming too powerful. 

If the governor’s impact on the state is less than, or at most equal to, part-time lawmakers, should or can he do anything to adjust the perception or the reality?

Pignanelli: Barring any weird emergencies, the current structure will remain. But the governor can reassert primacy in some areas through aggressive measures best suited to executive action including state government responses to drought, growth, air quality and higher education reform, etc. Unlike the Legislature, he has a singular bully pulpit to lead, persuade and cajole other officials, the media and citizens. Like a muscle, if regularly used, strength and coordination can result.

Webb: When I worked for Gov. Mike Leavitt (yes, it was 100 years ago, or so) I witnessed an immense amount of work with the Legislature behind the scenes, influencing and molding legislative action, without any public visibility or credit. It’s remarkable how the threat of a veto can kill a lot of bad legislation without it ever seeing the light of day. Or how legislation can be improved with the help of a cabinet member or executive branch expert.

I assume a lot of similar things happen today.

Mother’s rules apply to politics, too

Whatever your political leanings, take mom’s advice to heart and make her proud — at least occasionally

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

Saturation advertising over the last few weeks reminds us that on Sunday we honor our mothers. We should all reflect upon the nurture we received from our mothers. This includes the sage advice — Mother’s Rules — imparted to us when we were much younger.

Please consider the enormous problems facing the nation and the world. Pretty much all of them could be prevented, or solved, if we just listened to mom. Therefore, as a public service to all involved in the political world, we apply Mother’s Rules to politics.

If you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all. This rule is routinely ignored in politics, especially by cable news anchors, political operatives, campaign commercials and politicians in general (and sometimes by us). Let’s try, at least occasionally, to make mom proud.

You’ll catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. In politics, this is called collaboration, compromise and bipartisanship (but we could never understand why anyone would want to catch flies).

Do not live in the past. You cannot change it because life only moves forward. In other words, stop relitigating the 2020 election or the flaws of former presidents.

Tell the truth. It is easier to remember than telling a lie. This sound rule is related to the political axiom, “It’s usually not the crime, but the cover-up.” Just ask Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton if mom is right.

A penny saved is a penny earned. Borrow only as a last resort. Obviously, the hundreds of members of Congress for the last many decades who ran up an unfathomable federal debt ignored this motherly advice.

Treat others the way you want to be treated yourself. And, treat all people kindly. You have no idea what they may be going through. (Recent versions mention karma) For millennia, mothers have lectured about the benefits of kindness. Too bad it doesn’t help with fundraising.

You have the power to change your life. Mom is right about this. But we don’t think she would approve of all the book deals and television appearances from motivational speakers expanding on her advice. 

You can be anything you want to be. This explains why every U.S. senator and governor thinks they should be president.

Wear clean underwear. You never know when you might get in a car accident. For politicians, this means obey the laws and mores of society because you never know when you might be exposed by a whistleblower.

It takes a lifetime to build a good reputation but only a few minutes to lose it. And that rule came even before the immediacy of social media, text messages and the 24/7 news cycle.

Stay away from unsavory people. We can think of presidents, British royalty, senators, congressman, governors, lieutenant governors, state lawmakers, county commissioners and city officials who didn’t listen to mom’s prudent advice.

Make good choices. Choices have consequences. Adherence to this wisdom helps politicos avoid having to repeat the phrase, “I don’t recall” multiple times.

If your friends jumped off a bridge, would you jump too? If followed, this admonition would prevent a lot of lemming-like behavior in the political world.

Don’t be your own worst enemy. You can do better. The unforced errors of stupid personal behavior have destroyed countless political careers.

You made the bed. Now you have to sleep in it. Mom tells us to grow a spine, admit our mistakes, don’t dodge questions from the media or “plead the Fifth.”

Listen to the advice of the person who has nothing to lose or gain from your decision. Many lobbyists don’t like this bit of mother’s wisdom. Almost everyone has an agenda.

If you don’t know the answer, just say so. Adherence to this rule would eliminate much of the political commentary on cable television and social media. The talking heads wouldn’t have much to say.

You should sweep your own front porch before sweeping somebody else’s. Mom advises us to avoid hypocrisy.

The more we hesitate over solving a problem, the bigger it becomes. Immigration and a lot of other issues come to mind. The modern parlance in Congress is “kicking the can down the road.”

Pick your battles. Not everything is worth fighting for. Unless you get on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat or watch cable television where everyone fights over everything.

You can’t always change what’s happening, but you can change your attitude. She’s right. The world can be a very tough place. But we can still find happiness.

Moderation in all things. This is critical advice in an era of partisanship and extremism. Following this alone would guarantee some common sense in political deliberations.

Remember who you are and act accordingly. Even in a heated political campaign.

Look before you leap. Good advice. But don’t just live by the polls.

The quality of your thoughts is determined by what you read. Mom is warning us to avoid the foolish and nonsensical. … So why are you reading Pignanelli & Webb?

What the latest Supreme Court nomination says about Utah

Utahns, although generally conservative, understand the historical viewpoint Ketanji Brown Jackson provides.

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

Earlier this month, the U.S. Senate confirmed Ketanji Brown Jackson to the U.S. Supreme Court. This produced local controversy as Utah’s senators split on the vote, with Mike Lee voting no and Mitt Romney voting yes. This mirrors the division among Utahns as revealed by a recent poll.

According to the Deseret News/Hinckley Institute poll, 47% of Utahns agree that Jackson should have been confirmed, 32% disagreed and 21% did not know. Will this be an issue in upcoming elections? Does the survey indicate any important trends in Utah?

Pignanelli: “It’s important for all Americans to see that the default of a Supreme Court Justice is not in the mold of a white male. That it can be anybody.” — Kimberly Atkins Stohr, Boston Globe

In her autobiography and numerous articles, Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor emphasized how fellow Justice Thurgood Marshall brought the court a “special perspective.” His life experience prodded colleagues to the “power of moral truth” in deliberations and rulings.

Most Americans are intelligent, thoughtful individuals well-educated at a public or non-Ivy League private university. Amy Coney Barrettis the first justice in generations without an Ivy League degree, and therefore offers a needed perspective. Fortunately, her confirmation broadcasted the highest bench may be open to more than just an elite few.

Jackson, a Black American female, is a former defense counsel and trial judge. While some may disagree with Jackson’s prior judicial rulings, it is obvious her unique background will provide another important perspective.

The poll indicates Utahns, although generally conservative, understand the historical viewpoint Jackson provides. Even those strongly opposed to her nomination comprehend the significance and will be reluctant to raise this as an issue.

Thus, in future decades a fellow jurist will likely compliment Jackson for her insightful perspective.

Webb: Utahns are fair-minded people who understood that Jackson will be a liberal justice, as reflected in many of her opinions. But they also understand that Jackson will be replacing another liberal, and the ideological makeup of the court will not change. Conservatives will still hold a majority.

By essentially all accounts, Brown is a woman of accomplishment and integrity who is qualified to serve on the nation’s highest court. So I understand why Romney voted for her. However, the political ideology of Supreme Court justices absolutely does matter, especially in this era of government expansion, immense debt and federal encroachment into every aspect of our lives.

We need non-activist judges at all levels who understand that government, with its coercive power, is not the answer to every problem that confronts society. We need judges who will put constitutional principles ahead of personal preferences. So I understand why Lee voted against Jackson. Were I in the U.S. Senate, I would have voted with Lee.

What does the confirmation of Jackson signal about race relations in America?

Pignanelli: Even before given the right to vote, Black female Americans were a major pillar of our republic. Always pushing their family to participate in government activities, they also made the righteous and necessary demands for equal treatment. Continuously overcoming challenges while tirelessly toiling inside the system to change it was their standard. All Americans, regardless of personal characteristics, owe these fearless warriors of democracy a huge debt. Most, but certainly not all, Republican senators comprehended this fundamental element of our society and at least offered nice statements about Jackson before casting a negative vote.

The confirmation of Jackson’s is an overdue, positive step for our country that all should herald.

Webb: The confirmation of Jackson is, indeed, another sign that America is not currently a systemically racist country, as asserted by Black Lives Matter activists and many left-wing politicians. Racism does not permeate every institution in the country. Such assertions are one reason why the Democrats will likely get soundly beaten in elections later this year.

But we should all acknowledge that racism, in all its repugnancy, still exists and we need continual improvement. As has been the case in virtually every country in the world, past racism has been a stain and disgrace that has stifled the progress of millions of people who were different.

However, America has confronted and rejected its past racism. Just in my lifetime, race relations have dramatically improved. Real racism is far less prevalent and is not tolerated by polite society. We’re not perfect, by any means, but we’ve come a very long way. Black conservatives assert that today the nanny-state is far more harmful to Black progress than is racism.

Is there any hope that future Supreme Court nomination hearings will be less divisive?

Pignanelli: The cruel media circus that surrounds modern hearings is not what the founders intended. Special interest groups feed on these ideological fights. Only a concerted effort by a determined president and Senate leaders can alter this tragic development.

Webb: The Jackson confirmation process was relatively tame compared to the contentious, nasty brawls over the Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett nominations made by President Donald Trump. Even though Republicans asked Jackson tough questions, they did not engage in personal, raw and disturbing attacks as suffered by Kavanaugh and Barrett.  

Here’s how Utah can fight extremism in politics

This environment is an opportunity for Utahns to demonstrate how common sense can prevent extremism from debilitating our customs

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

Whether it’s in the corridors of the Capitol or city hall, on main streets in many cities, in community and religious gatherings or around the kitchen table, many Utahns are discussing the same thing: extremism in politics. Your columnists have been questioned by our fellow citizens regarding this subject, and we share our thoughts.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson recently delivered a blistering missive against Utah’s Gov. Spencer Cox and U.S. Sen. Mitt Romney. The video went viral throughout the state. Some relished the hostility. Others, while concurring with Carlson’s policy analysis, were pained by the personal disparagements. Still others were appalled and offended by the attacks. Zealotry has always oozed from the right and the left, but are we entering even higher levels of extremism in the country and in Utah?

Pignanelli: “American democracy is under threat from the left and the right. Both sides are chipping away at the foundations of the Republic.” — Jonathan Rauch, Peter Wehner

Our country and state were founded on the ideals of citizens engaging in substantive arguments over policy and belief differences. Often, this caused spurious allegations against usual opponents. But the recent controversy with Cox illustrates how right- and left-wing extremists utilize personal attacks within their own ranks.

Cox is enduring harsh critiques for a response to a student’s inquiry regarding personal pronouns. He is mocked for signing the Utah Compact on Racial Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (an important document signed by hundreds of Utahns representing all faiths and political affiliations). There are allegations “neoliberal interest groups control Cox’s brain.” (Thankfully, he is not vilified for baldness.)

Similarly, left-wing progressives are intolerant of liberals and moderates who do not conform to their extreme. These radical organizations use threats — and protests — to prevent public expression and free exchange of ideas in schools and businesses. Traditional defenders of open discourse (i.e. The New York Times and The Washington Post) are complacent to such actions. Studies reveal many Americans are self-censoring at abnormal levels to prevent character assassination.

McCarthyism schemes are purging those not deemed to be ideologically pure. This environment is an opportunity for Utahns to demonstrate how common sense can prevent extremism from debilitating our customs (especially respecting baldness).

Webb: The Carlson tirade illustrates much of what is wrong with politics today. I’m pretty darn conservative. I support traditional values, and I am frequently amused and repelled by the wokeism, identity politics and cancel culture of the far left. But whether someone agrees or disagrees with Cox on the transgender/sports issue, the nasty, personal attacks were not warranted.

Cox is one of the most decent, caring people anyone will ever meet, while holding basic conservative values and common sense.

Carlson hosts one of most popular shows on television because he knows how to enthrall his audience. He exaggerates and takes things out of context. Trouble is, if you’re a conservative and you don’t know Cox, you might believe Carlson.

Utah’s county political party conventions are delivering an unprecedented number of primary challenges, and even ousters, to longtime incumbents. Is this a sign that extremists are taking over the election process and what can be done?

Pignanelli: The delegate/convention process is a breeding ground for strident politics. The precinct caucus model is no longer reflective of 21st century lifestyles and will continue to create mischief until jettisoned.

Webb: Thank goodness for Count My Vote and SB54, which gave candidates the option to gather signatures instead of being entirely at the mercy of delegates at county and state conventions. Without it, the extremists would be in total control of the nomination process.

A number of mainstream and incumbent candidates would have been ousted at conventions, but will be on the ballot because they gathered signatures. Sadly, one long-serving mainstream conservative who will not be on the ballot is Rep. Steve Handy, who (to his regret) did not gather signatures and was defeated at convention.

Every year in the Legislature, efforts are made to weaken or eliminate the provisions of SB54. Commonsense leaders need to fiercely protect the right to gather signatures.

The way to avoid a takeover by extremists is for more people to participate in politics, allowing all party members to select party nominees. Hundreds of thousands of primary election voters choosing the final candidates will produce better results than just a handful of delegates at state and county conventions.

Eternal vigilance on this matter is necessary. Extremists are dedicated, persistent and obsessed. They will outlast normal people who enjoy life beyond politics.

Do individual citizens have an obligation to diminish extreme views in their own thoughts and actions?

Pignanelli: Living in a democracy is a privilege, not an entitlement. More is required than just paying taxes and voting. The internet is an easy and inexpensive means to determine the veracity of any statement. Therefore, every citizen should fulfill his/her responsibility to nominally investigate and develop positions on politics, science and culture. (This is a fantasy but we can always hope.)

Webb: We can all be nicer, recognize other points of view. Disagree, but don’t engage in personal attacks.

How strong is Sen. Mike Lee heading into election season?

Lee will face divided opposition that confuses voters and encourages supporters. Thus, the story will continue not to be about them but about Lee.

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

“Political junkie” is an expression frequently used because the description is so apt. Politicos are addicted to polls, among other things. Our kind recently received another infusion of this mind-bending drug — a survey on the Utah U.S. Senate race.

The Deseret News/Hinckley Institute pollindicates that 67% of voters in the upcoming Republican primary support incumbent Sen. Mike Lee. The remaining 33% are split among six GOP challengers. Any surprises? What does this suggest about the convention and primary elections?

Pignanelli: “I don’t even know who McMullin is.” — Chris Bleak, commentator, Hinckley Report

Most of the media and pundit coverage of the Senate race has focused on independent candidate Evan McMullin, his bipartisan support, and the intraparty foes lined up against Lee. But the survey reveals the true dynamics underpinning this race — Utah’s senior senator is very strong within GOP ranks.

The Republican precinct caucuses in March were lightly attended, allowing the more extreme and engaged elements to control delegate selection for the conventions. This factor is already impacting the county gatherings. Therefore, Lee will perform very well at the state event, especially because his opposition is disbursed among many challengers.

Lee’s opponents were hopeful that Democrats and independents would repeat their actions in the 2020 gubernatorial primary and change affiliations for the 2022 Senate primary. But the McMullin presence deflected most of this activity.

Lee will face divided opposition that confuses voters and encourages supporters. Thus, the story will continue not to be about them but about Lee.

Webb: Lee will come out of the state GOP convention with a big win and real momentum. Republican voters like him. I very much like both Ally Isom and Becky Edwards, two Republicans opposing Lee. They are terrific people, moderate conservatives and excellent candidates. It’s unfortunate they’re both in the same race because they will split the moderate vote. But even their combined votes likely wouldn’t be enough to defeat Lee in the primary.

Utah Republicans are simply not going to send another moderate (in addition to Sen. Mitt Romney) to the U.S. Senate to do battle with the Biden administration and liberal Democrats. They want a red meat Republican to fight for conservative causes in Washington.

Lee does have some vulnerabilities. As I’ve written previously, he’s more a conservative policy wonk than a back-slapping politician. He’s relatively low-key, and his charisma needs some work. But he fights for conservative causes and principles, and Utah Republicans appreciate that.

The poll also indicated a baseline for the major candidates in the general election: Lee gets 43% support in this early poll; independent Evan McMullin, 19%; and Democrat Kael Weston, 11%; with 24% undecided. McMullin refuses to reveal if he will caucus with Democrats or Republicans. Will this impact any momentum he has?

Pignanelli: The core support for Lee is such that he must obtain only a small fraction of the undecided for a guaranteed victory in November.

McMullin advocates claim he will not formally caucus with Democrats or Republicans in the U.S. Senate. Supposedly, such positioning gives him a powerful leverage. This is a fantasy because any member of Congress who does not affiliate with a major party diminishes effectiveness to the detriment of their state (i.e. committee assignments). Expect this naïveté to be an election issue.

In the event McMullin announces that he will caucus with a major party, a portion of voters would flee to the arms of other candidates. Consequently, running as the alternative to Lee in 2022, without an established reputation in Utah and defined political personality, will deliver McMullin no better results than when he opposed Donald Trump in 2016 (21.5%)

Webb: Forty-three percent support certainly isn’t great for Lee at this point. But with Weston and McMullin splitting the Democrat/liberal/moderate vote, Lee is clearly the favorite.

Most Utahns have no idea what McMullin stands for, other than that he loathes Donald Trump and conservative Republicans like Lee. That’s not a great platform to run on.

McMullin’s endorsement by leading Democrats indicates that he’s no conservative. I receive his many email messages begging for money and he comes across as a political opportunist desperate to get elected to something.

Some high-profile Democrats are supporting McMullin. Will they pay a price as candidates in future Democratic contests?

Pignanelli: The extreme right and left share many characteristics. This includes purity tests for candidates regardless of good intentions or strategic purposes. Democratic supporters of McMullin should expect major grumblingwhen attending party functions or seeking office.

Webb: A number of leading Democrats have gambled big by endorsing McMullin, with the clear intent of encouraging Weston to drop out of the race. McMullin would love to have the full weight of the Democratic Party behind him, plus some disgruntled Republicans.

But Weston doesn’t seem like the sort of fellow who will drop out. Thus, the Democratic ruse may backfire. Endorsing McMullin is an acknowledgement by high-profile Democrats that a Democrat can’t win statewide office in Utah. That’s a sad message that the party base doesn’t want to hear.

An April Fools’ look at headlines you probably won’t see

The year so far has been a tough slog. Here are some made-up headlines we hope will make you smile.

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

How time flies! The first quarter of 2022 is now behind us. Much has happened nationally and locally. As a service to our readers, we are providing a recap of recent major political headlines with their subheads that help explain current events. These journalistic treasures provide analysis in a political context that is imperative for all citizens to understand.

President Joe Biden gives flawless, nonrambling speech. Staff expresses gratitude for not having to “walk back” anything.

Bipartisan federal legislation will ensure balanced budget in five years. Members of Congress unanimously agree they won’t saddle future generations with monumental debt.

Sen. Mitt Romney lavishes praise on Trump. Considers him a man of integrity, humility and a model husband.

House Speaker Brad Wilson pushes mandatory “two flush” legislation. The Kaysville Republican hopes initiative will get water faster to the Great Salt Lake.

2022 Academy Awards praised for wholesome entertainment and modest dress on the red carpet. The whole event was family-friendly and wonderful to watch, say critics.

Evan McMullin will legislate and vote telepathically if elected. Independent candidate for Senate abhors actual personal interaction with Republicans and Democrats.

Republican legislators push back against extremist organizations. “We really don’t care what Gayle thinks,” is new motto.

Utah Democrats file antitrust suit against Republicans. “It should be illegal to totally monopolize Utah politics,” say party leaders.

Gov. Spencer Cox pulling back focus and funding for rural initiatives. Governor will target more money and effort on enhancing big city life. 

Congress to end televised committee hearings and free mail to constituents. Lawmakers desire to stop grandstanding and focus on substance.

Democratic Party leaders urge all candidates to file as independents. Such tactics are the only way to garner support of high-profile Democrats.

Senate President Stuart Adams proposes funding jetpacks as transportation innovation for all Utahns. The Layton Republican notes the high-tech equipment will save money on roads and public transit, eliminate high fuel costs — and will be much more fun.

Trump haters admit economy was booming under the former president. They also laud the fact that Russia didn’t invade any small countries while Trump was in power.

Trump base admits their hero lost the 2020 election. The evidence is obvious they say. Biden is the rightful president.

Deidre Henderson proposes pottery shards to replace paper ballots. Lieutenant governor notes process worked for ancient Greeks and will silence the election fraud promoters.

Ultraconservative Republican delegates admit irrational tendencies. “We can be too extreme,” they say. “We apologize for promoting conspiracy theories.”

Liberal Democrats strive for tax cuts and education vouchers. “Big government has shown it can’t solve society’s problems,” they say.

Mike Lindell to speak at business conference. “My Pillow” guy to speak to the proposition that even bad publicity is good for business.

Utahn describes wonderful experience walking in downtown Salt Lake City. “For two entire blocks I was not accosted by panhandlers!”

Diet Coke consumption drops in the Beehive State. Many Utahns convinced of the health hazards of too much cold caffeine.

Conservatives demand return of mask mandates and school shutdowns. “We long for the days of growing beards, spending the whole day in pajamas and the Zoom culture.”

Erin Mendenhall categorizes Republicans as oppressed class. The Salt Lake mayor proposes affirmative action for GOP as a disenfranchised minority in Salt Lake City.

Mike Lee admits to obsessive/compulsive disorder. Senator opens up about his obsession with the U.S. Constitution and his ability to recite the entire document backward.

Jenny Wilson promises to stop annoying Republicans in the Legislature. “Life won’t be as fun, but it’s the right thing to do,” says Salt Lake County mayor.

Lew Cramer walks into business reception and knows no one. Utah’s incorrigible networker is embarrassed; vows to do much better next time.

State’s third party fields slate of candidates who are far ahead in the polls. United Utah Party is on track for multiple victories in November.

Sean Reyes challenges Sen. Mitt Romney to a boxing match to decide 2024 GOP Senate nomination. Attorney General demands Donald Trump serve as referee. 

Two congresswomen express sorrow for promoting radical initiatives. Georgia GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and N.Y. Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez join forces to promote moderation and practical solutions to nation’s problems.

Jason Perry confesses to a five-second moment of anger. Unflappable Hinckley Institute director recalls an instant when he was only slightly friendly.

Pignanelli and Webb receive heartfelt accolades for weekly column. Intellectual depth, clarity and remarkable insights are lauded by liberals and conservatives.

So, happy April Fools’ Day! The last three months have been a tough slog for all of us, so we hope we elicited at least one smile. Please note that the last headline was real (smiley face).  

How has the war in Ukraine affected Utah politics?

Utah’s congressional delegation must maintain their opposition to the war or face stronger challenges at the convention, primary or general election contests.

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

Every major world event has ramifications in local politics. We look at what Vladimir Putin’s barbaric war on Ukraine means for Utah and national politics.

As Utahns see heart-wrenching images of Russian bombing innocent civilians, our congressional delegation has called for a strong response by the U.S. and our allies. Sen. Mitt Romney has especially emerged as a major player in foreign affairs, his insights frequently sought by reporters and Sunday morning talk show hosts. He has been especially outspoken on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, encouraging an even stronger response than the Biden administration is comfortable with. How has the war impacted the political fortunes of Utah’s delegation?

Pignanelli: “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.” — Winston Churchill

Defining episodes in politics are usually unpredictable yet impactful on many levels. Social and traditional media are detailing the needless destruction of innocent civilians in Eastern Europe. Furthermore, there is an undeniable good versus evil aspect to this tragedy. Therefore, the Ukrainian crisis is a defining moment that will affect national and state politics across the spectrum.

Romney received plenty of guffaws for mentioning Russia as our nation’s“No. 1 geopolitical foe” in the 2012 presidential debate. Only fools continue to mock Romney as his prestige is elevated locally and across the country for such prescience. He has become the standard against where others are judged.

Several ultra-extreme conservative elements have a history of praising Putin. Some are now disparaging Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Polls indicate American and Utah Republicans overwhelmingly support Ukraine in this war. Thus, the remainder of Utah’s congressional delegation must maintain their opposition to the war or face stronger challenges at the convention, primary or general election contests. This may require continued distance from the outliers. Incumbents will likely emphasize their strengths with voters (i.e. Chris Stewart — military experience, intelligence committee expertise; Blake Moore — international fairs and intelligence background.)

Because so many other countries are watching, the events in the Ukraine and how our local officials respond will determine many future trajectories.

Webb: The war and all of its military and political ramifications have yet to play out entirely, but it’s clear Utahns want to support Ukraine, even if it means a little sacrifice (like higher gas prices) here at home.

Romney is more of a traditional Republican, deeply suspicious of Russia and willing to exert U.S. power to keep him (and China) in check. Sen. Mike Lee, while supportive of Ukraine, is much more leery of foreign entanglements. Rep. Stewart has been outspoken in supporting strong sanctions against Russia and military support for Ukraine. Utah’s other House members have been less vocal, but are clearly concerned about Russian aggression and are supportive of Ukraine.

Utahns obviously don’t want World War III, but I believe they want the harshest sanctions possible against the dictator Putin, and the strongest support possible for Ukraine.

Most Americans support President Joe Biden’s response to Putin’s war, which includes harsh economic sanctions and sending weapons to Ukraine. Will Biden’s actions give him and his Democratic Party a boost politically as midterm elections loom next autumn?

Pignanelli: Both international and domestic economic turmoil exist. Consequently, the party perceived to be the adults in the room will prevail in November. Because support for Ukraine is bipartisan, political advantages can only be garnered through better messaging. For example, if the humanitarian toll continues, Americans may become impatient with diplomatic machinations that prevent even stronger sanctions and better weapons. Outspoken support for these activities maybe the litmus test.

Webb: The war is a stark reminder that the world is a very dangerous place and the relatively stable world order we are accustomed to can quickly turn upside down. In such an alarming situation, we need steady, wise and firm leadership. For the most part, Biden is providing that leadership, although there’s plenty to quibble about.

Things would be a little scarier if the mercurial and headstrong Donald Trump was still president. It’s hard to guess what his response to the invasion of Ukraine would be.

Biden’s biggest mistake is his response, or lack thereof, on energy. It’s obvious that the U.S., and Europe, must stop buying Russian oil and natural gas. We need an Operation Warp Speed to develop domestic energy, support Europe with American resources to eliminate dependency on Russia, and curtail the flow of billions of energy dollars into Russia.

Biden has made little effort to marshal and motivate the country’s energy leaders and resources. Instead, he seeks more oil from unreliable countries such as Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and Iran, and he’s doubling down on wind and solar, which are years away from supplying the reliable energy we need for electricity, transportation and industry.

Biden’s inexplicable energy policy will hurt him and Democrats politically.

With a few exceptions, the war has unified Republicans and Democrats in their revulsion of Putin and their support for Ukraine. Will agreement on Ukraine lead to more cooperation in Congress?

Pignanelli: Bipartisanship is available for matters relating to Ukraine, NATO, enhanced defense budgets and dealing with other international arrivals. But few other items.

Webb: Divisive election politics will reign supreme as this year’s midterm campaign gets underway. Both sides will seek every partisan advantage.

How will Trump affect Utah elections this year?

Like the grumpy man at the end of the street, many politicos will quietly avoid Trump while hoping his departure is soon coming.

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

Looming over the 2022 primary elections in Utah and around the country is the specter of Donald Trump. Utah’s primary is June 28, but primaries in some states have already started. We look at the impact of Trump in Utah and nationally.

Trump is busy endorsing candidates, holding rallies, starting a social media network and hinting at running for president in 2024. Will Utah GOP candidates seek his support, and will a Trump endorsement help or hurt candidates in Utah?

Pignanelli: “Trump in some ways — he’s like the big, bad wolf. He huffs and he puffs and but he never blows anybody’s house down, really.” — former Gov. John Kasich (R-Ohio)

Trump is reminiscent of the wealthy curmudgeon in many neighborhoods. Children are advised not to annoy him as their parents fear his wrath, but he is not invited to community events either.

Numerous national and state polls document a declining favorability for Trump as a presidential candidate in 2024. An increasing number of high-profile Republicans are openly distancing themselves from — and sometimes visibly criticizing — the former president.

However, that does not suggest that the Utah GOP candidates will publicly disparage or refuse endorsements from the former president. Several dynamics are in play. Trumpistas are an engaged minority who will show up at conventions and primary elections. So, Trump-bashing is a dangerous activity. Further, the “Never Trumpers” are far more attracted to those who just ignore rather than attack him.

Yet, knowledgeable candidates will determine from recent election results that unabashed support from Trump rarely guarantees victory. Recently elected Republican Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin set the standard of a perfect balancing act. He spoke with Trump privately but never utilized an endorsement or broadcasted the relationship.

Regardless of partisan affiliation or other demographics, Americans, including Utahns, overwhelmingly support Ukraine and despise Russian president Vladimir Putin. Trump’s recent compliments toward the dictator, when compounded by the effects of the war, including inflation and shortages in this country, could create a radioactive feature about him. By Labor Day, Trump’s reputation could be significantly battered and his broad impact diminished.

Like the grumpy man at the end of the street, many politicos will quietly avoid Trump while hoping his departure is soon coming.

Webb: Had Trump not gotten so weird about the 2020 election being stolen from him, his endorsement would certainly have helped Republican candidates. But Utahns are pretty sensible people, and I think they’re getting tired of Trump’s tall tales.

Trump is also hurt by appearing to be soft on the despot Vladimir Putin as he invades Ukraine, even though Trump’s Russia policies were actually tougher than his predecessors.

Many Utahns, myself included, liked a lot of Trump’s policies, as I’ve written many times. But his giant ego, pettiness, disloyalty to subordinates and, especially, his deranged focus on 2020, have damaged him in Utah among mainstream Republicans. So, cozying up to Trump and repeating his “stolen election” silliness may hurt more than help.

The way to handle Trump is precisely the way Virginia Gov. Youngkin did last year. Keep Trump at arm’s length. Don’t be critical of him (Sen. Mitt Romney unnecessarily goes out of his way to attack Trump). Instead, ignore him or remind voters of his good policies. Contrast the economy and shape of the country when he was in office with life under Biden. If asked about elections being stolen, just express total confidence in Utah’s election system. Politicians in other states will have to speak for themselves.

Will Trump help or hurt GOP chances of taking control of Congress this year?

Pignanelli: Trump is unpopular, but so is President Joseph Biden. Neither is garnering the credit they deserve for accomplishments in their respective administrations. Both are to blame for this messaging incompetence. However, Biden is in office and history documents the incumbent president’s problems blemish the midterm congressional elections.

Webb: Republicans have a remarkable opportunity this yearto retake Congress with big numbers and turn the country in a more conservative direction. But Trump is a definite wild card and he could make it harder for Republicans to cruise to a big victory. If he endorses a lot of extremist candidates and they win GOP nominations, that makes victory harder. But perhaps Biden is so weak, and GOP momentum is so strong, that even Trump can’t goof it up this year.

Make a prediction: Will Trump run for the presidency in 2024?

Pignanelli: Trump will wait until the last minute to announce … he will not seek the nomination. Troublesome polls and aggravating legal consternations will create barriers.

Webb: I’m going to predict what I hope happens: Trump sits it out. The goal of all sensible Republicans ought to be to convince Trump that he can’t win in 2024 and if he runs he’ll drag down the party. The presidency is sitting there waiting to be taken by Republicans in 2024. And the GOP has many stellar presidential candidates who are just as conservative as Trump, but without all the personality flaws and other baggage. It’s time for Trump to fade into the sunset.